Md. Salim @ Yash Vardhan@Md. Salim Usman Gani Sayyed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39262 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2014 Thana -AIRPORT District- PATNA ====================================================== MD. SALIM @ YASH VARDHAN@MD. SALIM USMAN GANI SAYYED, son of Sayyad Usman Banni, resident of Nala Supara, Plot no. 404, Sai Sadan, Sai Bazar Tulij Road East, P.S. Nala Supra (West), District Thane (Maharastra).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 214 of 2014 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna. The prayer of the petitioner for bail was rejected earlier on 05.10.2015 by this Court vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24231 of 2015 on merit.

Perused the Memo No. 78, dated 29.10.2016 of SubJudge-XII-cum-ACJM, Patna, which shows that charge has been framed against the petitioner and he expected to conclude the trial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39262 of 2016 (3) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 within 3 to 6 months. Since, prayer of the petitioner for bail has already been rejected on 05.10.2015 by this Court vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24231 of 2015 on merit, I find no fresh ground to re-consider the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for bail is again rejected. However, Sub-Judge-XII-cum-ACJM, Patna is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months by taking all steps. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the aforesaid period of six months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T