Umesh Singh And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40766 of 2012 ===================================================

1. Umesh Singh, Son of late Dwarika Singh.

2. Madhuri Devi, Wife of Umesh Singh. Both resident of Village-Bihari Bigha, P.S. Pandarak, Dist.-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar & Anr.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. S.M.Rahman (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

03. 22.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the nature of allegations against the Petitioners and the surrounding circumstances, let them be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sri Ramjha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh, Patna (or its successor) in connection with Complaint Case No. 488(C) of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40766 of 2012 (3) dt.22-01-2015 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T