Prem Raj @ Amresh Kumar @ Amresh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41278 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 2016 Thana -GIRIYAK District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIF) ====================================================== Prem Raj @ Amresh Kumar @ Amresh, son of Suresh Prasad Chaurasiya, resident of Village- Bahadi Bigha, P.S. Asthawan, District Nalanda (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deo Raj Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2016 in connection with Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No. 193 of 2016 (Nalanda) for the alleged offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 66(C) of I.T.Act, 2008, Section 18(A), 18(B), 18(C), 27(C), 28(A), 27(B)(ii), 33 EEC(B), 32(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and 3,4, 5, 7, 9A of Magic Remedies Act, 1954.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, similarly situated co-accused Munna Vishwakarma and Deepak Kumar have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 38632 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 37047 of 2016 respectively. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41278 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No. 193 of 2016 (Nalanda) on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/Ibrar U T