Aadil Ansari @ Aadil Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22298 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Aadil Ansari @ Aadil Hussain S/o Md. Alamgir Ansari @ Alamgir Ansari @ Md. Alamgir R/o Village- Kajichak, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Baliram Sao S/o Shri Panchu Sao R/o Village- Kajichak, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons have kidnapped and confined informant's minor daughter for the purpose of marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22298 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner is petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. The victim has been recovered and the place of recovery of victim does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the victim has denied to undergo medical examination. The victim has stated nothing against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T