Krishna Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40679 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Krishna Sah S/o Late Fakira Sah Resident of Village-Senduari, P.S. Hajipur Sadar District Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.43620 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Manoj Rai, son of Ram Pramod Ray @ Pramod Rai, resident of villagePanapur Langa, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.40679 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary (In Cr.Misc. No.43620 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2016 Since both the cases arise out of Vaishali P.S. Case No.150 of 2016, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Section

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40679 of 2016 (3) dt.22-11-2016 2/3 394 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently, Sections 395/412 of the I.P.C. were also added.

The name of the petitioners came in confessional statement of co-accused and after that some looted articles are said to have been recovered from the godown of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.40679 of 2016.

Submission on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.40679 of 2016 is that petitioner was not aware of this fact that seized articles were of looted property and moreover, petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing in Cr. Misc. No.43620 of 2016 submits that neither petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No.150 of 2016.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.H./- U T

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40679 of 2016 (3) dt.22-11-2016 3/3