Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22132 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2022 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav S/o- Late Balchand Yadav VillShivnarayan Bigha, P.S. - Rajauli, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned APP.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 380 of 2022 for the offence registered under sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 308 and 427 of the IPC lodged on 22.07.2022 by the informant Bhubaneshwar Yadav.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that the petitioner was trying to forcibly demolish the balcony of his home and upon protest, the assault took place and there is specific allegation against this petitioner of using iron rod over his head and hand causing fracture in his hand. Allegation is that upon other family members coming to rescue, they were also assaulted. This led to the FIR.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22132 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is counter case to the present FIR vide Rajauli P.S. Case No. 379 of 2022 lodged by the accused side, earlier, the accused were granted benefit of Section 41A of the Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP, on the other hand, has taken this Court to the last paragraph of the learned Session Judge order to show that allegation of using iron rod causing injury on the head is corroborated with the injury report. He further submits that anticipatory bail was rejected in the month of May, 2023 and a belated petition has been filed herein.

6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the allegation that has come against the petitioner, it would be appropriate that he surrenders and seeks bail.

7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

8. If the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U