Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21843 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Das Son of Sahendra Kumar Das Resident of Village - Datmi, P.S. - Hunterganj, District - Chatra (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that when he was going bank for the purpose of depositing an amount of Rs. 52,050/- by his motorcycle, three unknown miscreants overpowered him and snatched his bag in which the cash was carried as well as a Tab and other documents on gun point.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. His name has been figured in this case only on the confessional statement of one Anil Kumar made before the police who has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21843 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 16399 of 2025 vide order dated 21.03.2025. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2025 and charges have already been framed.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge, (if not framed) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2nd Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 subject to the following conditions :- (i). Petitioner will remain physically present in trial on each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court. (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T