Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21144/2020bail granted

Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-30Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21144 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2019 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Satish Kumar, Son of Birendra Malakar @ Virendra Malakar, Resident of Village- Pali, P.O.- Teusa, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in Atri P.S. Case No. 491 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25 (1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act and Section 37 (c) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The police has arrested the petitioner in drunken condition along with a country made pistol, however, it is urged that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in judicial custody since 17.11.2019 having no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21144 of 2020(2) dt.30-06-2020 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 491 of 2019 with a further condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T