Dinesh Thakur @ Dinesh Sharma And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43621 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2014 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Dinesh Thakur @ Dinesh Sharma son of Yadav Lal Thakur

2. Geeta Devi wife of Dinesh Thakur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 48 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366 A, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that even prior to the date of occurrence, the petitioners being annoyed by the evil act and conduct of his son, had filed a written report to the Officer-in-charge of Raxaul Police Station, East Champaran, stating therein that their son Bittu Kumar had illicit relationship with the daughter of the Gaurishankar Sharma. He has also contended in the said letter that if any untoward incidence takes place, he would not be responsible for their son's illegal action

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43621 of 2014 (2) dt.16-04-2015 P2/2 and he was no where concerned with the same. The said letter dated 24.07.2013 finds entry in the Station Diary of the concerned Police Station. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present case is altogether a matter of love and affair which was earlier supported by the family members of the girl and, therefore, petitioners may not be implicated in the present case.

Considering the aforementioned submissions and also the fact the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest / surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the each amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 48/14 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T