Munardhan Sah @ Nardhan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21176 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2019 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Munardhan Sah @ Nardhan Sah, S/o Vashawan Sah, Resident of VillageSohagpur, P.S.- Hathua, Distt- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in Hathua @ Hathuwa P.S. Case No. 120 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The name of the petitioner has surfaced during investigation with respect to recovery of 33.4 liters of illegal liquor on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 28.04.2020. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21176 of 2020(2) dt.30-06-2020 2/2 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Gopalganj in connection with Hathua @ Hathuwa P.S. Case No. 120 of 2019 with a further condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T