Ansarul Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23145 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- SIMULTALLA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Ansarul Ansari Son of Idrish Mian Resident of Village - Kanodi, P.S. - Simultalla, District - Jamui.
2.
Md. Tajuddin Ansari Son of Idrishi Mian Resident of Village - Kanodi, P.S. - Simultalla, District - Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shaukat Alam, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Simultalla P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025 dated 08.12.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(1), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07.12.2025, the accused persons arrived at the Informant's house armed with weapons, abused and assaulted him and his family members. Vakil Ansari was attacked with a sword causing injury, while others, including the informant and his brother Sahbuddin Ansari, were beaten with rods, lathis, and bricks. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23145 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 informant's mother was also assaulted when she intervened.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that total nineteen persons have been made accused in this case; however, specific allegations of overt acts have been made against the petitioners, whereas the injuries sustained to the Informant and his family members are simple in nature.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injuries caused upon the Informant and his family members are found to be simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Simultalla P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23145 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.
7. The learned court below is directed to verify the nature of injury caused upon the Informant and his family members and if the statement of the petitioner is found to be incorrect, the bail bonds shall not be accepted. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T