← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76706/2018bail granted

Guddu Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76706 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-591 Year-2018 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ======================================================

1. Guddu Paswan, aged about 25 years, Son of Ghanshyan Paswan, Resident of Village- Gauri Punda, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

2. Ganauri Manjhi, aged about 50 years, Son of Late Puna Manjhi, Resident of Village- Gauri Punda, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners, who are in custody, seek bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 591 of 2018, Special Case No. 9333 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. Allegation against petitioners is of recovery of 20 litres of country made liquor from their possession. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 05.10.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76706 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 591 of 2018, Special Case No. 9333 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(4) If the petitioners is found involved in similar nature of offences, after their release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel their bail bond. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T