Patna High CourtMJC/1010/2015dismissed

Babloo Ojha And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-07Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1010 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22103 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Babloo Ojha, S/o Sri Dadan Ojha, R/o Village Siswan Mauza, P.S. Paharpur, Distt. Motihari (East Champaran)

2. Manoj Yadav, S/o Sri Ram Prit Yadav, R/o Village-Matiariya, P.S.- Harsidhi, Dist. Motihari (East Champaran) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Abhayanand, the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Anil Kumar Sinha, the Deputy Inspector General (Human Rights), Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri P.N. Rai, The inspector General (Bihar Military Police), Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Jitendra Kumar, The Chairman, Central Recruitment Board Cum Addl. Inspector General, S.C.R.B. Bihar, Patna.

5. Sri R.K. Dave, The Chariman, BMP 22, Selection Board, Jehanabad.

6. Sri Nishant Kumar, The Chairman, District Selection Board, Jehanabad.

7. Sri Sunil Kumar, The Chairman, Central Region Board no.1, Patna.

8. Sri Nagendra Singh Yadav, The Chairman, Central Region Board no. 2, Patna.

9. Sri Nishant Kumar, The Chairman, District Selection Board, Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the S t a t e : Ms. Manisha Singh, A.C. to G.P.-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2017 No one appears for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State is, however, present.

A show cause has been filed on behalf of O.P. No.9, in which it has been stated that the petitioners' case has been considered and rejected since vacancies were not available in the district of Jehanabad. Thus, there being no vacancies available in the said District, the Superintendent of Police,

Patna High Court MJC No.1010 of 2015 (4) dt.07-12-2017 2/2 Jehanabad was not included to participate in the recruitment process or made the Chairman of the Recruitment Board. The contempt application is, thus, wholly misconceived and is dismissed.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U