Rana Pratap Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17839 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Rana Pratap Singh, Son of Sri Paras Nath Singh, Resident of village - Bahuara, P.O. Chota Amawan, P.S. Chand, District - Kaimur (Bihar) 2.

Arvind Kharwar, Son of Munshi Kharwar, Resident of village - Bahuara, P.O. Chotkatmaum, P.S. Chand, District - Kaimur Bihar 3.

Nithali Chamar (Ram), Son of Cheku Ram, Resident of village - Khiri, P.S. Bhagwanpur, P.O. Bhagwanpur, District - Kaimur 4.

Rinku Devi, Wife of Wigupal, Resident of village - Lodhan, P.O. Lodhan, P.S. Chand, District - Kaimur 5.

Govind Yadav, Son of Ramashish Yadav, Resident of village - Devkali, P.O. Akadhi, P.S. Mahaneya, District - Kaimur 6.

Sunil Kumar, Son of Rajendra Ram, Resident of village - Karnpura, P.O. Durgawati, P.S. Durgawati, District - Kaimur 7.

Shila Devi, Wife of Bhulan Chauhan, Resident of village - Bahuara, P.O. Chotka Amawan, P.S. Chand, District - Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar 2.

The State Pareyojna Nedeshak Shiksha Bhawan, Rashtra Bhasha Parishad, Saidpur, Rajendra Nagar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate Executive Committee Bihar Pariyojna, Kaimur 4.

The District Programme officer, Kaimur 5.

The District Education officer, Kaimur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajesh Singh, GP-16 Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2024

1. No one appears for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2. The petitioners have filed the instant application for the following relief(s) :-

Patna High Court CWJC No.17839 of 2015(2) dt.09-02-2024 2/2 "1.(i) For issuance of direction, order or writ including writ in the nature of direction to the respondents not to terminate old men/women non teaching staff in the name of not Matric Pass. (ii) Any other relief/reliefs that the petitioner may be found to be entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

3. As no one appears for the petitioners, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U