Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44685 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Deepak Kumar, Son of Janardhan Bhagat, Resident of Senuari, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased, who appears to have died within one year of her marriage. The dead body of the deceased was disposed of in very hurried manner without giving any information to her natal people as claimed by the informant. There is allegation of illegal demand and torturing. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44685 of 2016 (5) dt.05-12-2016 2/2 bail in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 30 of 2016 pending in the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur stands rejected.
However, the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur is directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of Sessions in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order even by separating the case of the petitioner from the case of other accused and after commitment, the concerned Sessions court shall proceed with the trial of the petitioner and shall try to conclude the same within six months from the date of framing of the charge.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T