Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43954/2016bail granted

Chakhana Jha @ Sumit Kr. Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43954 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2016 Thana -BARHARA District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Chakhana Jha @ Sumit Kr. Jha S/o Late Amal Jha @ Amal Kishore Jha residnet of Village- Shahwan Khunt, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, Distt- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 18.7.2016 in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 27 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 364, 366A, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons have kidnapped the victim girl. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was driver of the vehicle and remained in custody for about six months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both side and considering the submissions, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43954 of 2016 (4) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea in connection with Barhara P.S.Case No. 27 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U