M/S Sitaram Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9864 of 2021 ====================================================== M/S Sitaram Rajesh Kumar through Proprietor Rajesh Kumar aged about 61 years, Gender- Male, S/o Late Sitaram Shah, R/o Bekapur, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger having GSTIN 10AJKPS4518A1ZO ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.

3.

The Assistant Commissioner to State Tax Munger Circle Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aman Raja, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 07-07-2021 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/7

3/7 It is brought to our notice that vide impugned order dated 27.02.2021 (Annexure-8) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Bhagalpur in Appeal Case No. MGGST-30/20-21, the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated 21.03.2020 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Munger in GSTIN/ID:10AJKPS4518A1ZO (Reference No.

ZA100320020555F), has been rejected merely on the grounds of being barred by limitation. Both the orders were ex parte in nature.

In our considered view, the delay stands sufficiently

4/7 explained on account of COVID restrictions.

Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has no objection if the matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority for deciding the appeal afresh. Also, while considering and deciding the appeal, the ground of delay shall not be taken into account and the appeal shall be decided on merits. Also, during pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Statement accepted and taken on record.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also perused the record made available, we dispose of the present petition in the following mutually agreeable terms:- (a) We quash and set aside the impugned order dated 27.02.2021 (Annexure-8) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax,Bhagalpur in Appeal Case No. MGGST-30/20-21.

(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that ten per cent of the total amount, being condition prerequisite for hearing of the appeal, already stands deposited. If that were so, the appeal shall be decided on merits. However, if the amount

5/7 is not deposited for whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next date;

(c) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to the order passed by the Appellate Authority. However, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner's deposit is in excess, the same shall be refunded within two months from the date of passing of the order;

(d) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present petition. This shall be done immediately.

(e) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the Appellate Authority i.e. Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur on 18th of August, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible through digital mode; (f) The Appellate Authority shall condone the delay in filing the appeal and decide the appeal on merits after complying with the principles of natural justice; (g) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the parties to place on record all essential documents and materials, if so required and desired;

6/7 (h) During pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

(i) The Appellate Authority shall pass a fresh order only after affording adequate opportunity to all concerned, including the writ petitioner;

(j) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take unnecessary adjournment;

(k) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal on merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner; (l) The Appellate Authority shall pass a speaking order assigning reasons, copy whereof shall be supplied to the parties;

(m) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order, if required and desired;

(n) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(o) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law, with a

7/7 reasonable dispatch;

(p) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and all issues are left open;

(q) If possible, proceedings during the time of current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through digital mode;

The instant petition sands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to communicate the order to the appropriate authority through electronic mode.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sujit/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 16.07.2021 Transmission Date