Ram Gulam Paswan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 42688 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -664 Year- 2000 Thana - NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- NAWADA ============================================== Ram Gulam Paswan, Son of Mosafir Paswan, Resident of Village-Sitarampur, P.S.-Mofsil, District-Nawada. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Smt. Paro Devi, W/o Lakhan Mistri, R/o Village-Sitarampur, P.S.-Mufasil, District-Nawada.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s: Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP. ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER

02. 05.10.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he has misused the privilege of bail for which he is in custody since 30.06.2016. It is further contended that the bail of three other persons were also cancelled who have already been granted bail by court below. The petitioner undertakes to remain present on each and every date during the course of trial in the court below. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Ram Gulam Paswan is directed to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42688 of 2016 (2) dt.05-10-2016 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 664 of 2000 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

Vikash/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) U T