← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1095/2024allowed

Sahjadi Parveen @ Shahzadi Parwin v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1095 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.854 of 2024 ====================================================== Sahjadi Parveen @ Shahzadi Parwin Wife of Md. Sharif Ansari @ Sarif Alam, Resident of village - Dahua, Police Station - Bounsi, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Deveopment Scheme, Indra Bhawan, Baily Road, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, District- Bhagalpur. 4.

The District Magistrate, Banka.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Banka.

6.

The Deputy Director, Welfare, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Bounsi, District - Banka. 8.

Tabassum Ara, Wife of Mumtaj Rejaul Ansari, Resident of Village -Dahua, Police Station - Bounsi, District - Banka.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Balram Kapri, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024

1. The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.854 of 2024, which has stood dismissed on account of non-prosecution, by an order dated 22.02.2024.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the brother of the counsel for the petitioner had fallen ill suddenly and therefore, he could not attend the hearing of the case, when the case was called out for hearing on 22.02.2024,

Patna High Court MJC No.1095 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 thus, a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

3. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.854 of 2024 to its original file.

4. The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U