← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75519/2018bail granted

Tinku Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-17Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75519 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2018 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Tinku Chaudhary, Son of Anil Chaudhary, resident of Village- Ishakchak Pasi Tola, P.S.- Ishakchak, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Ishakchak P.S. Case No. 195 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273, & 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) 30(d) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 15 litres of country made liquor from his possession. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 04.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75519 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Ishakchak P.S. Case No. 195 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T