Bipin Kumar Pankaj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24284 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1117 Year-2019 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Bipin Kumar Pankaj son of Subodh Kumar Mishra Resident of Village - Mishradih, P.O. Lachhuara, P.S. Sikandra, District - Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Arti Mishra Wife of Bipin Kumar Pankaj and Daughter of Jagat Narayan Mishra Resident of Village - Mishradih, P.O. Lachhuara, P.S. Sikandra, District - Jamui at present resident of Village - Vaishali, P.O. Vashali, P.S. Vaishali, District - Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudra Deo For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sunil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complain Case no. 1117 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of D.P. Act.

The prosecution story in nutshell is that the complainant was married with the petitioner namely, Bipin Kumar pankaj on 27.10.2010 but the petitioner was demanding motorcycle as a dowry from beginning. Due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand the accused persons along with petitioner assaulted the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24284 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 complainant.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. After prevailing good sense, matter has been compromised between the parties and the complainant is residing with the petitioner. He has got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with complaint Case no. 1117 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Hajipur, Vaishali subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U