Raj Kumar Singh @ Abhinesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23498 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2025 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Singh @ Abhinesh Singh S/o Late Chandra Mani Singh @ Late Chandramani Singh Resident of village- Kulhariya, P.S - Koilwar, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP.
For the Informant/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Madhav Kumar Jha, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2025 dated 25.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 74 and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have inflicted knife blow upon the aunt of the informant, namely, Sonam Patel.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23498 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/3 case. It is submitted that there is an error of record in the impugned order when it has been mentioned that the injuries received by the aunt of the informant is grievous in nature rather the injury report which was called for by this Court by order dated 08.04.2026 would go to show that the injury is simple in nature. It has been submitted that there is no allegation of repetition of blow. It has further been submitted that the informant is on an inimical term with the petitioner and earlier also an FIR was lodged against him. It has lastly been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent which was lodged by the prosecution side itself.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioner on earlier occasion had also indulged himself into criminal act against the prosecution party.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23498 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 3/3 satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2025. (i) It is directed that the petitioners will not tamper with the evidence and indulge into any sort of criminal activity with the informant's side and if the petitioner gets himself involved subsequently in similar nature of offence, the prosecution would be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of bail bonds.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T