← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30013/2025bail granted

Tarannum @ Tarannum Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30013 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== Tarannum @ Tarannum Khatoon Wife of Md. Arman Resident of Village - Neem Dargah Gali, Panchayati Akhara, P.S. - Kotwali, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabia Gulnaz For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 520 of 2022 dated 20.08.2022 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 341, 147, 148, 149, 323, 308, 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 17.08.2022 at about 6.00 PM, a scuffle took place between two girls at Panchaiti Akhara, Neem Dargah Gali near the informant's house. In the meantime, the petitioner and the co-accused persons came there and started abusing and assaulting the informant and in the meantime, the petitioner assaulted the informant with knife causing injury to her. When the informant's mother and sister

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30013 of 2025(5) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 came to rescue, all the accused persons also assaulted them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. As per the injury report, the informant sustained simple injury. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of inflicting knife blow to the informant.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 520 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with further condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30013 of 2025(5) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T