The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited And ORS. v. M/S Venky Steel Private Limited, Purnea

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.358 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3638 of 2014 ======================================================

1. The Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.

2. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna through its Director.

3. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Kosi Electric Supply Area, Saharsa.

4. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Purnea.

5. The Electrical Executive Engineer (Commercial & Revenue), Electric Supply Circle, Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

M/s Venky Steel Private Limited, National High Way-31, Bypass Road, Belouri, Purnea, District- Purnea, through its Director Chakarwati Prasad. son of Sri Brahmadeo Prasad Das, resident of Sri Krishna Nagar, P.O. , P.S. & District- Begusarai.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2015 Heard Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Power Holding Company. This review application has been preferred by the Bihar State Power Holding/Distribution Company praying for review of the judgment and order dated 26.9.2014 passed in CWJC No.3638 of 2014 which was heard and disposed of along with CWJC No.13707 of 2014.

Having heard Mr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-Company and taking note of the grounds

Patna High Court C. REV. No.358 of 2014 (2) dt.22-04-2015 raised by the petitioners for review of the order passed in the writ petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that the grounds so raised even if be a ground for appeal, it does not point out any error apparent on record or is based on discovery of fresh material, warranting a review.

In the circumstances discussed, no case for review is made out and the review application is accordingly dismissed. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U