Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23968 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2023 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Rinku Devi W/o Santosh Yadav R/o Village- Khureshan, P.S.- Salkhua, (Banma Itahri O.P.), District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Rashmi Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that petitioner assaulted her mother by an iron rod causing fracture of jaw, while Dukhi assaulted the informant by Khanti causing injury on head, while Dilkhush assaulted the informant by knife causing injury on left hand. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that no doubt the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the mother of the informant by an iron rod causing fracture of jaw, but then the injury suffered by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23968 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 injured is simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated. It is also submitted that an altercation had taken place, in which male member of both side had assaulted each other and it appears that in the occurrence, the mother of the informant also got hit, but then the informant took the same as an opportunity to implicate the petitioner in order to coerce the other family members into submission.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into account the fact that petitioner is a woman, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 94 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T