← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6277/2024dismissed

Naiyer Mughni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice Harish Kumar,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6277 of 2024 ====================================================== Naiyer Mughni S/o Quratul Ain, R/o Mahiyar Pur, Konhaibari, P.S.- Kishanganj, Pin Code-855107, District-Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraia Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Executive Officer cum Secretary, Bihar Rural Road Development Agency (BRRADA), Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraia Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

3.

The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraia Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

4.

The Chief Engineer-2, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraia Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

5.

Sri Arvind Kumar The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Work Circle-Kishanganj, District-Kishanganj, Govt. of Bihar.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work DivisionKishanganj-1, District-West Champaran, Govt. of Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Advocate (05) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-04-2024 The petitioner is concerned with a show cause notice dated 23.02.2024 produced at Annexure-P7. The learned Government Pleader submits that there is already an order passed dated 30.03.2024, which is not placed on record.

2. The petitioner is left with a remedy to challenge the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6277 of 2024(3) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 said order in an appeal where all contentions, including that of improper show-cause notice having been issued can be taken.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Harish Kumar, J) sharun/- U