Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39936/2014bail granted

Md. Rustam Mian @ Md. Rustam v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-22Mr. Justice Gopal Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39936 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -541 Year- 2014 Thana -TATARPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Md. Rustam Mian @ Md. Rustam S/o Noor Mistri, Resident of VillageSafiullah Chak Hussinabad, P.S.- Ishkchak, District- Bhagalpur .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Manish Kumar 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 399 and 402 of the Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the police, on secret information, raided and arrested Md. Firoz and Md. Tarim and the name of the petitioner finds place in the confessional statement of Md. Firoz. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39936 of 2014 (2) dt.22-04-2015 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with the Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 541 of 2014 (G.R. No. 2861 of 2014) to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the petitioner shall not indulge in such activity further and if he indulges, then, the deponent must inform the Court about the indulgence of the petitioner and the Court below, itself, shall proceed to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Gopal Prasad, J) SA/- U √ T √