Md. Israrul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10524 of 2021 ====================================================== Md. Israrul Haque, S/o Anwarul Haque, resident of Mohalla- Dharampur, P.s.- Samastipur (Town), District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Directorate of Land Records and Survey through its Director, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Director, Land Records and Survey Directorate, Bihar, Patna 5.

The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Suneil Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Shailendra Kr. Dwivedi, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner's candidature has been rejected for not fulfilling the minimum requisite qualification in terms of the advertisement at Clause 4, which reads as follows:- पदननाम न्यूनतम ययोग्यतना एवसं अहतर मनानदय अभ्युककत क्र० सं० अममीन सरकनारमी मनान्यतना पनाप्त 22000/-(मनानदय - संसथनान सद अमनानत कमी कडिगमी 15345/-, EPF and यना ESI सरकनार कना असंशिदनान- आई०टमी०आई० सद सवर्वेयर 2655/-, मयोबनाईल लैपटटॉप व इन्टरनदट व्यय कमी कद पकशिक्षण में सफल। पकतपयूकतर-4000/- पकतमनाह 12 मनाह कद कलए)

Patna High Court CWJC No.10524 of 2021(4) dt.17-08-2023 2/2

3. The petitioner's qualification is based on a certificate issued by National Institute of Electronics & Information Technology, Patna. The same is neither a degree issued by a government recognised institution, nor a certificate showing successful completion of training as surveyor at an ITI.

4. The petitioner, therefore, does not possess the requisite qualification and has rightly not been considered on account of not possessing the requisite minimum qualification as per the advertisement.

5. No case is made out for invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shashank/- U