Raj Kamal Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Raj Kamal Ravi Son of Ganesh Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Bhirkhi, Ward No. 21, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura, ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to have in possession of 4335.48 litres of illicit liquor and engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that name of petitioner transpired in the present case out of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused person, who is none but the father of this petitioner. It is submitted that out of family dispute, petitioner was implicated in the present case. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21714 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 further submitted that alleged illicit liquor was not recovered from conscious physical possession of this petitioner, who claims his antecedent clean.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima-facie not appears to be made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-V-Special Judge, Excise Court-I, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short "B.N.S.S."). (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/- U T