← Library
Patna High Court/23162/2023bail granted

Ashwani Sharma @ Ashwani Vishkarma v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23162 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2022 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== Ashwani Sharma @ Ashwani Vishkarma S/O Late Kamal Kishore Sharma Resident of Village- Sandalpur, (rental house of Madam Yogi), P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger, Permanent Addrss- Maniya Chauraha Near Vishwakarma Mandir, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Pd. Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No.259 of 2022, registered for offences under Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)A, 26(i) (ii), 35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that the informant, upon receiving information that one Dablu Kumar Sharma is running a mini gun factory in a rented house of one Madan Yogi, had gone to the said place of occurrence along with his police force and had arrested Dablu Kumar Sharma, whereafter a

2/4 search was conducted in his house and huge quantity of articles used in manufacturing of illegal arms were seized. It is also alleged that the petitioner is the father of said Dablu Kumar Sharma and he is running the said mini gun factory, jointly with his son Dablu Kumar Sharma.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is an accused in one another case, but he is on bail in the said case. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that neither the petitioner was arrested from the spot nor he has any connection with the said mini gun factory, inasmuch as he is not staying at the said rented house being used by his son Dablu Kumar Sharma and he is staying separately, hence he be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

3/4 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the fact that no articles used for manufacturing of illegal arms have been recovered either from the possession of the petitioner or his house, apart from the fact that it is the categorical averment of the petitioner that he is staying separately from his son, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioner to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No.259 of 2022, subject to the conditions

4/4 as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U T