Praduman Das @ Pradum Das @ Pradum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23124 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2018 Thana- MANSURCHAK District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRADUMAN DAS @ PRADUM DAS @ PRADUM Son of Sri Hari Das Resident of Village - Mahamadpur Shakra, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Distt - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the F.I.R. and his name surfaced on the confessional statement of co-accused Manoj Das who has been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 15380 of 2019 on 21.05.2019. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23124 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Chief Judicail Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Mansurchak Police Station Case No. 80 of 2018, G.R. No. 4399 of 2018, subject to the conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife. (II) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (III) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(IV) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T