Fazle Kareem @ Md. Fazle Kareem v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21542 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2024 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Fazle Kareem @ Md. Fazle Kareem Son of Mahmood Alam village- Loam Ps- Sadar, Dist- Darbhanga.

2.

Afzal Kareem son of Mahmood Alam village- Loam Ps- Sadar, DistDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 249 of 2024, registered on 22.06.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons, including the petitioners, with the allegation that while construction work was underway, the five accused persons arrived at the site and began assaulting the informant and others with iron rods. As a result, the informant and his brother were brutally injured and were admitted to DMCH for treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21542 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offense. Counsel further submits that, based on the contents of the FIR, it becomes clear that the dispute is related to land, particularly for the way. Counsel also submits that the injuries sustained are simple in nature. Additionally, counsel submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents and are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that, according to the allegations in the FIR, two persons from the informant's side were assaulted, resulting in head injuries. Counsel further submits that the Trial Court, while passing order on the bail application, acknowledged in the order sheet that there were four injuries sustained by the two persons.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T