Omkar Nath Singh @ Omkar Nath @ Seru Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23703 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2016 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== OMKAR NATH SINGH @ OMKAR NATH @ SERU SINGH, Son of Krishna Singh, Resident of Village - Dullahpur, P.S. - Simri, District - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 472, 196 of the Indian Penal Code.

The report was called for vide order dated 17.09.2020 and the same has been received from the court of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Buxar in Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 400 of 2016, which is kept at Flag 'P'. The report states that the trial shall be disposed of within a period of six months. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing fraud by the forging the document.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.03.2017.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23703 of 2020(4) dt.09-11-2020 2/2 petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 400/2016 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, DistrictBuxar. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from today and both the parties are directed to extend their full cooperation in early conclusion of the trial. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T