Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21223 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2018 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR Son of Vinod Raut Resident of Village and P.O. Sheohar, Ward No.- 5, Nagar Panchayat Sheohar, District - Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant in his written complaint has alleged that he has a Saving Account in Bank of India and used to withdraw money from the cheque provided by the Bank. However, Rs. 1,12,000/- was withdrawn from his account without his knowledge or cheque issued by him and he has alleged that FIR named 5 Bank employees in connivance with each other have misappropriated his money.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21223 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Akash Kumar who is daily wager in the Bank. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 12.02.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 256 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U