← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45313/2016bail granted

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-19Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45313 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -743 Year- 2015 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Patel, Son of Ashok Kumar Patel, resident of mohalla - Mahua Chowk, S.D.O. Road, P.S. Hajipur Town, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.743 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.56916 of 2015 and this Court vide order dated 09.02.2016 rejected the bail application of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year's judicial custody. The petitioner is in jail since 02.10.2015.

Looking to the period of custody, let the petitioner-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45313 of 2016 (2) dt.19-10-2016 2/2 Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Patel be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.743 of 2015 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/wife/son of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T