Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76107/2018bail granted

Munna Kewat @ Chhotu Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76107 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Munna Kewat @ Chhotu Kewat Son of Fekan Kewat@ Pheker Kewat Resident of Village- Abdullahchak, Police Station- Gopalpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-b)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act.

Allegation against petitioner is recovery of one loaded pistol from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge IX cum ACJM, Patna, in connection with Gopalpur

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76107 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 P.S. Case No. 129 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T