Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46017/2016bail granted

Satyendra Yadav @ Satish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-21Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46017 of 2016 (2) dt.21-10-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46017 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -ARIYARI District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Satyendra Yadav @ Satish Yadav son of Nandkeshwar Yadav resident of village Chak Abgil PS Ariyari (Kasar) Dist. Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed. Rizwanul Haque For the Opposite Party/s Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 21.10.2016 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 307 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that the petitioner assaulted injured Punita Devi who sustained injury on her abdomen and the informant claims that the aforesaid injured Punita Devi was carrying pregnancy at the time of alleged occurrence. The impugned order goes to show that three injuries were found on the person of injured Punita Devi and opinion regarding injury on abdomen of injured Punita Devi was kept reserved for want of USG of abdomen but at para 10 of the petition, it has specifically pleaded by the petitioner that the aforesaid injured Punita Devi did not consult to any lady doctor nor produced any report of USG. So, the aforesaid fact goes to show that she had not sustained

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46017 of 2016 (2) dt.21-10-2016 any injury on her abdomen.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties and also taking note of this fact that there is case and counter case between the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in Ariyari (Kasar) P.S. Case no. 84/2016.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T