Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23513 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2022 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

PINTU KUMAR SON OF AJAY PATEL @ AJAY KUMAR R/O VILLAGE- GHOSHI DHIBARA, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTRICTJEHANABAD 2.

RAM BABU YADAV @ RAM BABU KUMAR SON OF RAMESHWAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE- KHAPURA, P.S.- KAKO, DISTRICTJEHANABAD 3.

BHOLA MANJHI M/O- MALTI DEVI, S/O- MOHAN MANJHI R/O VILLAGE- GOPALGANJ, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that the accused persons assaulted him causing injury on hand and when his brother came to save him Pintu along with 50-60 accused assaulted him also, further, two motorcycles were handed over to the police which were used in the occurrence by the accused persons, it is also alleged that they snatched Rs. 40,000/- from the informant and a golden chain from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23513 of 2022(2) dt.09-11-2022 2/2 Ajit.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that the informant and his brother were assaulted but then there is no injury report on record and allegation of snatching mobile and cash along with golden chain are ornamental in nature, it is next submitted that even the order impugned does not record anything about the injury. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 8 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T