Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20512/2019bail granted

Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-01Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20512 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2018 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== MD. MUSLIM Son of Late Shamsuddin @ Md. Samsudin Resident of Village- Araila, P.S.- Tiyar, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Naushad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. (Dr.) Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Tiyar P.S. Case No. 22/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected by order dated 24.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42193/2018 with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after six months if no substantive progress is made in the case.

Report from the court below regarding present stage of case has been received wherein it is mentioned that charge has not been framed in this case till date.

From the report of the court below it appears that trial is not likely to be concluded within short period.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20512 of 2019(4) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Tr. No. 2263/2018, arising out of Tiyar P.S. Case No. 22/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T