Shailesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28163 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== SHAILESH KUMAR Son of Yogendra Rai Resident of Village - Madarpur, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt - Saran at Chhapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S.Case No.481 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is named in the FIR with allegation of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody for more than one year and except the suspicion there is nothing against him. On the other hand the learned counsel for the APP has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that earlier also he tried to outrage the modesty of the victim and when the family members protested he went upon for committing mar-pit. It is also submitted that record is still traceless.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28163 of 2019(6) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. and perused the report, from which it appears that summons have been issued for examination of the non-official witnesses and the trial court has also prayed for 6-8 months' time for conclusion of the trial.. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T