Pramod Pathak v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24810 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2017 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Pramod Pathak Son of Anirudh Pathak @ Anrudh Pathak Resident of Village: Bharasara, P.S. kargahar, (Barahari O.P.), District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Suman Devi Wife of Pramod Pathak, D/o Patli Suwan Mishra Resident of Village: Babhangama, P.S. Kudra, District Kaimur, at Bhabua. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
SMT. SAHIN BEGAM, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24810 of 2017(4) dt.19-09-2017 2/2 of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Tiwari, A.C.J.M., Sasaram, District Rohtas in connection with Kargahar P.S. case No.15 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T