Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36513 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2017 Thana -HARNAUT District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Priyanka Devi W/o Madan Paswan, R/o Village- Sirsi Dihra, P.S.- Harnaut (Kalyanbigha), District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Harnaut (Kalyanbigha) P.S. Case No. 117 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against he petitioner, who is a lady, is that she also participated in the occurrence and had abused and assaulted the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that specific allegation of assault is against other accused persons. Nothing specific has been attributed against this petitioner. Petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36513 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Harnaut (Kalyanbigha) P.S. Case No. 117 of 2017 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make herself available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Manish/- U T