Haidar Ali v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.309 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1911 of 2024 ====================================================== Haidar Ali Son of Md. Haroon Rashid, Resident of Bara Barharpur, Chatauni, P.O. Motihari, P.S. Chatauni, District- East Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Haroon Colony, Phulwarisharief, Patna.

4.

The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Haroon Colony, Phulwarisharief, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran.

6.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran. 7.

The Secretary, Managing Committee, Madrasa Anjuman Islamia (Madrasa no. 66), District East Champaran.

8.

The Principal, Madrasa Anjuman Islamia (Madrasa no.66),District East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG -13 For Resp. Nos. 7 & 8 :

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Adv.

Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-07-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, learned Additional Advocate General No. 13 for the State and Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, learned counsel for respondent nos. 7 and 8.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission

Patna High Court L.P.A No.309 of 2025(3) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 to withdraw this appeal with a view to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority/Tribunal as observed by the learned Single Judge.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that we have not examined the case of the appellant on merits and, therefore, as and when the appeal is filed by the appellant before the Appellate Authority, the same shall also be considered on its own merits.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Sanjay/sunil/- U