Patna High CourtMJC/4519/2014disposed

Ganesh Sharma And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-29Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.4519 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4519 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4298 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Ganesh Sharma, son of Late Jamuna Sharma, Resident of MohallaAdarsh Colony, Bed Vidya Nagar, Near-Maltikunj, P.O. , P.S. & DistrictAurangabad.

2. Babu Nand Singh, son of Late Ramprit Singh, Resident of Village Mahua Bigha, P.O. Obra, District-Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through its Chief Secretary namely Mr. Anjani Kr. Singh, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. Mr. Hukum Singh Meena, The Registrar, Co-operative Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Mr. Indevar Pathak, the Managing Director, The Central Co-operative Bank-cum District Co-operative officer, Aurangabad.

4. Mr.Navin Chandra Jha, District Magistrate, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2015 Perused the show cause reply filed on behalf of Central Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad through its officials, who are opposite parties.

It appears that the order dated 18.04.2014 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 4298 of 2014 has been complied with. The order has been passed on petitioner's representation.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the opposite party has done mere formality disposing of the petitioners' representation and no proper reason has been

Patna High Court MJC No.4519 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015 assigned for rejecting the petitioners' claim. I do not find any substance in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners. If, according to the petitioners, reason assigned by the opposite party is not proper and not in accordance with law, it will be open to the petitioners to question in accordance with law before an appropriate forum. This application stands disposed of.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) singh/- U