Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26692/2024disposed

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26692 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2022 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kamlesh Kumar son of Ram Udgar Mahto Resident of Village- Somnaha Tola Chaksima, P.S.- Chakmehsi, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dwij Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the state

2. The instant application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Sessions Trial No. 383 of 2023 arising out of Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2022 instituted for the offence u/s 307, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act to which Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently.

3. Earlier the application for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18536 of 2023 with a direction to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

4. In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26692 of 2024(3) dt.28-06-2024 2/2 dt. 07.05.2024 with regard to the present stage of trial has been received by which it appears that the trial is likely to be concluded within one year.

5. No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner, as such, his prayer is rejected.

6. Accordingly, this application stands disposed off.

7. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of six months, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Prakash/- U