B.K. Anand @ Veerendra Kishore Anand @ Virendra Kishore Anand v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21068 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2019 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

B.K. ANAND @ VEERENDRA KISHORE ANAND @ VIRENDRA KISHORE ANAND Son of Briksha Ram Resident of Mohalla - Shahganj Lane, Mahmadpur, P.S.- Pirbahore, District - Patna. 2.

Kanishka Anand @ Kaniska Anand @ Kanishk Anand Son of B.K. Anand @ Veerendra @ Virendra Kishore Anand Resident of Mohalla - Shahganj Lane, Mahmadpur, P.S.- Pirbahore, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anurag Saurav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 379 and 120B of the IPC.

The prosecution case, as per the written report of Dr. Md. Ali Sabbar, dated 22.01.2019 submitted to the Station House Officer, Peerbahore Police Station, is to the effect that petitioner no.1, B.K. Anand @ Veerendra Kishore Anand @ Virendra Kishore Anand introduced the informant with his son, Kanishka Anand @ Kaniska Anand @ Kanishk Anand, (petitioner no.2) and one Tauhin Pal for getting the son of the informant admitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21068 of 2019(2) dt.15-04-2019 2/3 in the medical college through management quota. Consequently, the informant gave cash amount of Rs. 21 lacs to petitioner no.1 and deposited Rs. 18 lacs in the banck account of co-accused, Tauhin Pal, but thereafter, neither the son of the informant was admitted in the medical college nor the money was returned by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner admittedly, no amount was transferred in the bank account of the petitioners and there is no proof on record with regard to payment of cash amount made to the petitioner no.1. The total amount of Rs. 18 lacs were transferred by the informant in the bank account of co-accused, Tauhin Pal. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that subsequently petitioner no.1 admitted the transaction of cash amount and he also assured to return the said amount given to him.

Considering the fact that no amount through banking channel has been transferred in the account of the petitioners, coupled with the statement made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners are not having any criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21068 of 2019(2) dt.15-04-2019 3/3 antecedent, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U t