Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39230/2016bail granted

Chandan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-21Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39230 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -221 Year- 2015 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Chandan Mahto Son of Amir Chand Mahto Resident of Vill- Pakariabar, P.S- Udawantnagar, Distt- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner is accused in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 221 of 2015 registered under Sections 25(1-b)A and 26 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is accused in Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 221 of 2015 regarding recovery of one country-made pistol along with three live cartridges. Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused on 07.04.2016 by this Court, as he was accused in three other cases, as detailed in paragraph no.3 of the application. Further submission is that in the present case, petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39230 of 2016 (2) dt.21-09-2016 2/2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 221 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relatives/parents of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial in the Court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of trial without any reasonable cause, the Court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shail/- U T