Awadh Kishore Anand v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17459 of 2015 ====================================================== Awadh Kishore Anand Son of late Saryu Ram Resident of Mohalla-New Harni Chak School Road, Beure More,P.S Beur Fulwarishrief District Patna Presently Secretary, Sunita Manv Kalyan Kendra ,Gram- Mirzapur P.s -Kanti, District Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Welfare, of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, Govt.of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director, Department of Welfare of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, Govt.of Bihar,Patna.

5.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Corporation ltd, Patna.

6.

The Chairman /Secretary, Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Corporation ltd, Patna.

7.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

8.

The Administrator, Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Corporation ltd, Patna Buddha Colony, Bihar, Patna. 9.

The District Executive Officer, Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Corporation Ltd., Muzaffarpur.

10.

The District Development Officer, Muzaffarpur. 11.

The Director, Ruler Development Authority, Muzaffarpur. 12.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division ,Muzffarpur. 13.

The Deputy Director, Welfare Department of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, Bihar Patna.

14.

The District Welfare Officer, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

NONE For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, AC to GP 3 For Corporation :

Mr. Ranjeet Kr. Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has

Patna High Court CWJC No.17459 of 2015(2) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U