← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32759/2014disposed

Sheo Shankar Singh And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-30Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32759 of 2014 (05) dt.30-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32759 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2013 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Sheo Shankar Singh

2. Dwarika Singh

3. Kashi Singh

4. Ram Nath Singh

5. Laxman Singh

6. Badri Singh .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Ray-Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat(Spl.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Informant, a Halka Karmchari on an order of District Magistrate had filed written report against the petitioners disclosing the fact that petitioners are interfering with enjoyment of the land having settled in favour of landless. From the allegation, it is evident that it did not justify application of Section 3 (i) (iv) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act as there happens to be no allegation of dispossession. With regard to interference, that happens to be in the background of Title Suit no. 148 of 2012, filed on behalf of petitioners and in order to make out a defence

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32759 of 2014 (05) dt.30-04-2015 case, instant prosecution has been launched at the behest of State not by the so called aggrieved. Hence, application of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the face of the allegation became doubtful. With regard to other offences, that happens to be bailable one.

Accordingly, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned lower Court with a prayer for bail which, the learned lower Court will favourably consider in light of aforesaid finding.

With the aforesaid observation, instant petition is disposed of.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Vikash/- U T