Prem Kumar @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27430 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2025 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Prem Kumar @ Pappu Yadav, S/O Umashankar Prasad, R/O VillageAnandpur, P.S- Surajgarha, Distt.- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate Mr. Adarsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 25(1-AA) and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the rented portion of house of this petitioner, certain articles pertaining to be used for manufacturing illegal arms were recovered and one Bittu Kumar who is the tenant has disclosed that he was manufacturing the same within the knowledge of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27430 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that the premises from where the recovery was made is tenanted and though the petitioner is the owner of the tenanted premises, he has got no role in the act. It has further been submitted that by twisting some words, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 313 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T